Nightlore

How Nightlore Started, and Why It Stayed Small

The site began out of a fairly specific frustration: most of what passed for sleep journalism online was written by, or quietly funded by, a mattress or supplement company with an obvious reason to reach a particular conclusion. Finding a plainly written, independently reported piece on something as ordinary as bedroom temperature turned out to be harder than it should have been.

What we built instead is smaller and slower. Writers work directly with an editor from the first pitch, sources are checked against their original material rather than against someone else's summary of them, and a second editor reads every draft before it goes live. That review step has meant fewer articles per month, which we consider a fair trade.

The reader-facing side follows the same logic: funding sources are disclosed, corrections are logged rather than quietly edited away, and there is a direct way to reach an actual editor rather than a general inbox that nobody reads.

We do not run a claim just because it sounds plausible. If I cannot find the original source, the sentence gets cut, not softened.
Margaret ChalmersMargaret ChalmersSenior Editor, Sleep Coverage
Liam OseiLiam OseiResearch and Fact-Checking Lead

Independence

The site takes no sponsorship from mattress, supplement or bedding brands, which keeps the writing free to say a claim doesn't hold up.

Named Sourcing

Every fact carries a visible origin, whether a study, an interview or a manufacturer's own spec sheet, so readers can check our work themselves.

Slow Editing

We would rather publish three solid pieces a week than ten rushed ones, so drafts sit with a second editor before anything goes live.